Monday, September 12, 2011

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone Review

http://www.movieposter.com/posters/archive/main/27/A70-13704
The first time I saw this film, I was on a school field trip with my 4th - 6th grade class; which was the perfect age for Harry Potter knowing that we were and still are the same age as the main actors of the film. We were excited and literally jumping up and down on the bus on our way to the movie theater. The fact that our principal let us skip the WHOLE day of school for us to go see a movie, that some certain schools would probably do everything possible to shut down the franchise, was a huge honor and I still remember it as one of the greatest movie theater experiences to this day. How great was the movie you might ask? Here's my review:

The movie open's up with Albus Dumbledore (Richard Harris) and a cat who transfigures into Professor McGonagall (Maggie Smith) awaiting on the street of Private Dr. for a man named Hagrid (Robbie Coltrane) who is supposedly bringing a boy. He arrives within seconds on a flying motorcycle carrying a baby in his gigantic arms. No problems at all, trusts Dumbledore to Hagrid. They drop him off on a doorstep of a residence owned by, according to McGonagall: "The worst muggles imaginable".
Dumbledore then says his departing words in such a sensitive tone: "So long... Harry Potter", right before the opening title appears.

Then we dive into our main hero, Harry Potter who is now grown up to be at age ten-going-on-eleven. He lives in misery as he is pretty much to what you call a slave to the "worst muggles imaginable", The Dursleys who are of his Aunt, Uncle and cousin. We get a good establishment of each character, especially Harry as his life seems to be at its saddest the way we see the Dursleys treat him, until he unintentionally gets his revenge by "making a few things happen" without knowing how at the zoo. That's not all, we also see The Dursleys extremely pissed tearing up letters that come day after day addressed to young Harry Potter. Like Harry, the audience doesn't know why. One crazy antic after another, the Dursleys end up trying to hide out in a place where they can avoid all of Harry's mail coming their way. Talk about extreme measures. That is until a character barges into their hideout, is it a burgler or a mass murderer? No it's Hagrid from the beginning of the film, introducing himself in a nice fashion by handing Harry that letter that couldn't manage to get away from him. The letter says that, Harry's been accepted into the school of Hogwarts of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Is Hagrid playing a joke on Harry? No, because after more is explained, we end up discovering that our main hero is not only kind, generous and is able to put of with his family's shit for life, but that also he is a wizard.

That's just the first 30 minutes of the movie by the way people, there's still 2 more hours to be dove into. So the rest of the movie shows Harry goes shopping for school supplies located in a place that muggles don't know about called Diagon Alley. He then boards a train (located also in a place unknown to muggles) that escorts students to Hogwarts. That's where Harry befriends our other two main characters of the film, Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) and Hermione Granger (Emma Watson). Characters develop easily well as they then exit the train and then travel in canoe-like boats to where we finally get our first glimpse of Hogwarts. With the visuals and John Williams score as spectacular as the first look at Diagon Alley; I could already tell using my ten-going-on-eleven year old brain that the movie would get better from there.

That's when the movie really starts getting good and establishes each new location perfectly without over explaining or showing too many shots that you would find in the trailer to the film. That's when Harry then begins his adventures at Hogwarts by getting sorted into one of the four houses, taking classes that involve potions, wands, and flying broomsticks, and later discovering the second half of the title to the movie: The Sorcerer's Stone.  That's the part where I'll stop explaining things here and just tell you from here on about why I think this movie is fantastic and why you should definitely see it if you haven't yet.

If you're looking for a great film made for both kids and adults that has great actors, great direction, amazing visuals, and music done by the best film composer ever; then this film is for you. It literally keeps you entertained from beginning to end to where it doesn't feel like a two hour and thirty minute film. Besides it being perfectly cast and the sets looking a lot like how I imagined them in the book, I was the most impressed with Chris Columbus' direction in this film. Yeah, the same guy who made comedies like Home Alone and Mrs. Doubtfire made Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone as well. I was a little hesitant at first when I heard he was the one that was directing the film, that is until I saw the trailer which eventually within seconds became my most anticipated film of the year. When the film was getting made, I first thought (judging from his previous films) there was a chance he'd put too much humor in the film and not make it dark and demented like it was in the books. Thankfully, none of that happened and had the look of the film live up to the book quite well. That was what impressed me the most.

Among it being the first film of the seven books (eight movies), it definitely makes a great first start of the series. Even if there was a lot taken out of the book like most people complain about, I can't complain at all knowing it still makes for a great movie for what is written into the film. Also I know that a lot of people also complained about Daniel Radcliffe having blue eyes because according to the book Harry Potter had green eyes, but that doesn't mean it should ruin the film for you. Radcliffe was still the perfect Harry Potter. He still looked a lot like him and he did a great job acting out the character (especially for age 11). Same goes to Rupert and Emma as well. Honestly though, I think the best actor in this film though is Richard Harris who played Dumbledore. He was PERFECT when it came to character and looks. He totally steals the show in the end when listing the housecup winner (my favorite scene in this film). Honorable mentions for best cast role go to Hagrid (Robbie Coltrane) and Snape (Alan Rickman). I wish I could say all the actors in this film, but aside from Radcliffe, Grint and Watson, those three lit up the screen to where I seriously don't know if I would've enjoyed the film as much if it weren't for them.

The last thing I've gotta mention is how well adapted the screenplay really is, and how literally every movie (except the 5th one) was written by only one guy. Yes, from the writer of Wonder Boys and The Fabulous Baker Boys... Steve Kloves. I was super impressed how much work he put into writing the films. I'm sure it's not easy when it comes to adapting one of the biggest selling book series of all time, so I must express my thoughts on how well he did with the screenplay. In my opinion, I think this is the best adapted among all the films so he definitely did no wrong here, nor did the rest of the people who worked on this film. So what do I think of this film overall? Probably the BEST way to start off a series of films. The writing, direction, acting, visuals, John Williams' score, all perfect. If you haven't seen the film yet, please do ASAP because this is one not to miss out on.

**** 

Saturday, September 3, 2011

Special Goodbye to Harry Potter



Before I start my reviews, I just had to give a shout out to how much Harry Potter has done for me and how much I will miss it. 10 years it took to make 8 films to what I believe to be the greatest movie franchise ever, adapted from published material. In 2001, I was only 10 years old when I heard there was a Harry Potter movie coming out in November on the 16th. Like every other kid that didn't think Harry Potter worshiped the devil, I got excited. The even better thing is that I actually got to go on a field trip opening day to see Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. I'm serious, got the whole day of school off just for that one experience, which I still consider to be one of the greatest of last decade. At age 20, I still wish I could re-live that experience over and over. When I saw that movie, I was hooked; hooked enough to go see it two more times in theaters that same weekend. I even got it on DVD the day it came out and watch it about 4 or 5 times in one weekend. Obviously, it was something like I've never seen it before, and I had been watching a ton of movies since my dad introduced me to his VHS movie collection when I was age 8. I agree with what Richard Roeper said in his review on "At the Movies", it was like The Wizard of Oz of our time. He still stands by that statement, and I still concur.

Over the years, I went to every single opening day of a new Harry Potter movie because I couldn't get enough until it ended. I never knew when it was going to end because J.K Rowling kept writing books while the movies were already being made. I knew that the students at Hogwarts only attended there 7 years until graduation, but I kept wondering if J.K Rowling would get greedy and start writing spin-offs and such to make more money. Thankfully she didn't, because I was also worried if the kid actors would be too old by the time the seventh book/2 movies were made. Thankfully they were not as well, and no replacements were made among any of the characters EXCEPT for Dumbledore.

In 2002, I was devastated to hear that Richard Harris, who played Dumbledore in the first two films, had passed away. I was sad and worried at the same time. I thought Richard Harris made the PERFECT Dumbledore that he seemed totally irreplaceable. So after his passing I asked myself, who would play Dumbledore in the next 6 films? Well thankfully the new Dumbledore, played by Michael Gambon, wasn't a disappointment at all and managed to play the role well throughout the rest of the series. I still overall think that Richard Harris was the better Dumbledore, but Gambon did great at the role as well.

As years went by, I aged as fast as the actors did and came to the year 2011 where I finally got to see the end of the series, which was one of the most exciting experiences to any franchise. My expectations were high, and they all came true. I'll discuss more of that when I review the last film. If you haven't seen the last film yet, it'd be best to catch up before reading my reviews, though I never post any spoilers in my reviews anyway unless I alert it. This case being not.

So overall in reviewing the movie series as a whole, I'm happy to say that I was so entertained by each movie (except one of them) so much that it was totally worth the 10 year wait to see what happens in the end. People complained about there being too many movies, or them being too long, and etc. Thankfully I didn't care and after seeing the final movie, it ended exactly how I wanted it to. I'll go into that more in the review.

I just wanted to give a special thanks to the three main actors of Harry Potter: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson; the directors: Chris Columbus, Alfonso Cuaron, Mike Newell and David Yates; the lead producer David Heyman; the screenplay writer Steve Kloves (no I'm not including the other guy who wrote the 5th movie); and most of all J.K Rowling for creating one of the most fantastic looking, entertaining, and magical experience that I've ever seen on the big screen. Harry Potter will always be my most favorite saga of all time. 

:D

Friday, September 2, 2011

September 2011 Update

Hey guys,

Sorry the Harry Potter special is taking so long, but I just finally started the fall semester of college and needed to get a regular routine going first. Anyways, I'm still working on the Harry Potter reviews. It should come out great. Looking forward to posting it. :)